Cases and enforcement · Decided
Thaler v. Vidal, 43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2022); E.D. Va. No. 1:20-cv-00903; cert. denied, No. 22-919 (2023)
Verified Checked against its sources on 3 sources quoted
- Court or authority
- US – Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; US – Eastern District of Virginia
- Status
- DECIDED: Federal Circuit affirmed on August 5, 2022; Supreme Court denied certiorari on April 24, 2023
- Filed
- August 6, 2020
- Resolved
- April 24, 2023
- Case type
- Patent Law
- Plaintiffs or complainants
- Stephen Thaler
- Defendants
- Katherine K. Vidal (Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office)
- Legal issues
- Whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system can be listed as the inventor on a patent application under U.S. patent law; Interpretation of the term 'inventor' in the Patent Act.
Summary
The USPTO refused Stephen Thaler's patent applications because they named only his AI system, DABUS, as the inventor. Thaler sued in the Eastern District of Virginia on August 6, 2020, and the court granted summary judgment to the USPTO. On August 5, 2022, the Federal Circuit affirmed, holding that the Patent Act requires an inventor to be a natural person. Rehearing was denied in October 2022, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari on April 24, 2023, leaving the rule in place under U.S. patent law.
Key dates
- August 6, 2020Filed
- April 24, 2023Resolved
- October 16, 2026Checked against sources
- October 21, 2026Checked against sources
Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: October 16, 2027.
Evidence
Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.
-
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:20-cv-00903-LMB- TCB, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. ______________________ Decided: August 5, 2022
Supports: Appeal and decision date
Thaler challenged that conclusion in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which agreed with the PTO and granted it summary judg- ment.
Supports: District court outcome
We, too, conclude that the Patent Act requires an "inventor" to be a natural person
Supports: Holding
-
Case 1:20-cv-00903-LMB-TCB Document 1 Filed 08/06/20 Page 1 of 25
Supports: District court docket and filing date
-
Apr 24 2023 Petition DENIED.
Supports: Certiorari denied
Decision Date: August 5, 2022 Rehearing Denied: October 20, 2022
Supports: Rehearing denied
Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Thaler v. Vidal, 43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2022); E.D. Va. No. 1:20-cv-00903; cert. denied, No. 22-919 (2023)”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/case-041/.
Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.
Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.
