When the evidence changes, the research should change with it. When we get something wrong, readers should be able to see what we corrected and why.
This page is the public record of material corrections to content published by the Center of Eminence, across its three centers (CoE | AI Cost & Governance, CoE | AI Talent & People and CoE | Vendor Intelligence) and the research drawn from Eminence Scan and EmTrace. Each entry shows what changed, why the change was necessary, and when it was made.
What counts as a correction?
| Type of change | What it means | Where we record it |
|---|---|---|
| Factual correction | Information was inaccurate, misleading, or insufficiently supported when published: for example an incorrect figure, date, attribution, regulatory reference or product capability, or a conclusion the evidence did not adequately support. | This log. |
| Substantive update | A material development after publication, such as a new regulatory requirement, a change to product functionality, revised commercial terms, or new evidence that affects an assessment. The original information was not necessarily incorrect, but the change may materially affect how readers should interpret it. | The affected page’s version history or update information. |
| Routine editorial change | Formatting, spelling, grammar, presentation, or wording changes that do not alter meaning. | Not recorded in the public log. A scheduled review that confirms existing information is reflected in the page’s review information. |
Changes to our Research Methodology & Evidence Standards are recorded in that policy’s version history, with material revisions also referenced here.
What a correction entry tells you
Each material correction in this log identifies:
- Date: when the correction was made.
- Affected content: the page or research item involved.
- Nature of the correction: what information was changed.
- Reason: why the correction was necessary, including relevant new or previously overlooked evidence.
- Source of review: whether reader feedback, new evidence, internal review, or another source prompted it, without disclosing confidential contributor information.
A material change to a conclusion deserves the same visibility as a material change to a number.
Request a correction
If you identify information that may be inaccurate, outdated, incomplete, or unsupported, tell us through Help Improve the Center of Eminence. Identify the page, describe the concern, and include any supporting sources or context.
All proposed corrections are evaluated against the supporting evidence and our editorial standards, regardless of who submits them. Submissions do not automatically change published content. Where the evidence warrants a correction or update, we revise the relevant material and document the change according to this policy.
Reader contributions and privacy
When a submission leads to a correction, we may acknowledge that reader feedback prompted the review without identifying the contributor or their organization.
Submissions are handled privately. We do not publish identifying information or quote individual contributions without the applicable consent. Contributors may also ask for information to be considered confidentially, under our Submission & Contribution Policy and Privacy Policy.
Our commitment
Research credibility is not established by claiming that errors never occur. It is demonstrated by how they are identified, evaluated, and addressed.
Our commitment is to correct inaccuracies, incorporate material new evidence, and maintain a transparent record of changes that affect the information our readers rely upon.
Corrections log
Material corrections to published research appear below, with the date, affected page, description of the change, and reason for the correction.
No corrections have been recorded to date.