Eminence Growth Solutions, home
Menu

Cases and enforcement · Decided

Park v. Kim, 91 F.4th 610 (2d Cir. 2024), No. 22-2057

Verified Checked against its sources on 2 sources quoted

Court or authority
US – United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Status
DECIDED: DISMISSAL AFFIRMED; COUNSEL REFERRED TO GRIEVANCE PANEL (30 JAN 2024)
Filed
2024-01-30 (decision); appeal No. 22-2057 from the E.D.N.Y. judgment of 2022-08-25
Resolved
January 30, 2024
Case type
Professional Misconduct, AI Ethics
Plaintiffs or complainants
Minhye Park (Plaintiff-Appellant)
Defendants
David Dennis Kim (Defendant-Appellee). Jae S. Lee, the plaintiff's counsel, was referred to the court's Grievance Panel and is not a party.
Legal issues
Professional responsibility, attorney ethics, use of generative AI in legal research, Rule 11 sanctions, duty to verify legal authorities

Summary

Minhye Park appealed the Eastern District of New York's August 2022 dismissal of her suit against David Dennis Kim for repeated, willful failure to comply with court orders. The Second Circuit affirmed on January 30, 2024. It separately found that Park's counsel, Jae S. Lee, had cited a non-existent state court decision in her reply brief, which she admitted came from ChatGPT and which she had not read or verified. The court referred her to its Grievance Panel and ordered her to give her client a copy of the decision. No outcome of the grievance referral was found.

Key dates

  1. January 30, 2024Filed
  2. January 30, 2024Resolved
  3. October 16, 2026Checked against sources
  4. October 21, 2026Checked against sources

Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: October 16, 2027.

Evidence

Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.

  1. Park v. Kim , Case No. 22-2057 (2d Cir. Jan. 30, 2024) (Parker, Nathan, Merriam, JJ.) ( per curiam ).

    Supports: citation and panel

    Deception Inspection: Attorney Faces Discipline for Citing Fake Law The National Law Review Reporting or analysis

  2. Because this conduct falls well below the basic obligations of counsel, we refer Attorney Lee to the Court's Grievance Panel, and further ORDER Attorney Lee to furnish a copy of this decision to her client.

    Supports: referral of counsel to Grievance Panel

    Plaintiff-Appellant Minhye Park appeals from an August 25, 2022, judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Chen, J.)

    Supports: parties and underlying judgment

    Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of dismissal.

    Supports: affirmance

    Case 22-2057, Document 178-1, 01/30/2024, 3606898, Page1 of 12

    Supports: docket number and decision date

    Opinion, Park v. Kim, No. 22-2057 (2d Cir. 30 Jan. 2024) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (via GovInfo) Primary source

Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Park v. Kim, 91 F.4th 610 (2d Cir. 2024), No. 22-2057”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/case-033/.

Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.

Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.