Cases and enforcement · Decided
Park v. Kim, 91 F.4th 610 (2d Cir. 2024), No. 22-2057
Verified Checked against its sources on 2 sources quoted
- Court or authority
- US – United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
- Status
- DECIDED: DISMISSAL AFFIRMED; COUNSEL REFERRED TO GRIEVANCE PANEL (30 JAN 2024)
- Filed
- 2024-01-30 (decision); appeal No. 22-2057 from the E.D.N.Y. judgment of 2022-08-25
- Resolved
- January 30, 2024
- Case type
- Professional Misconduct, AI Ethics
- Plaintiffs or complainants
- Minhye Park (Plaintiff-Appellant)
- Defendants
- David Dennis Kim (Defendant-Appellee). Jae S. Lee, the plaintiff's counsel, was referred to the court's Grievance Panel and is not a party.
- Legal issues
- Professional responsibility, attorney ethics, use of generative AI in legal research, Rule 11 sanctions, duty to verify legal authorities
Summary
Minhye Park appealed the Eastern District of New York's August 2022 dismissal of her suit against David Dennis Kim for repeated, willful failure to comply with court orders. The Second Circuit affirmed on January 30, 2024. It separately found that Park's counsel, Jae S. Lee, had cited a non-existent state court decision in her reply brief, which she admitted came from ChatGPT and which she had not read or verified. The court referred her to its Grievance Panel and ordered her to give her client a copy of the decision. No outcome of the grievance referral was found.
Key dates
- January 30, 2024Filed
- January 30, 2024Resolved
- October 16, 2026Checked against sources
- October 21, 2026Checked against sources
Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: October 16, 2027.
Evidence
Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.
-
Park v. Kim , Case No. 22-2057 (2d Cir. Jan. 30, 2024) (Parker, Nathan, Merriam, JJ.) ( per curiam ).
Supports: citation and panel
-
Because this conduct falls well below the basic obligations of counsel, we refer Attorney Lee to the Court's Grievance Panel, and further ORDER Attorney Lee to furnish a copy of this decision to her client.
Supports: referral of counsel to Grievance Panel
Plaintiff-Appellant Minhye Park appeals from an August 25, 2022, judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Chen, J.)
Supports: parties and underlying judgment
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of dismissal.
Supports: affirmance
Case 22-2057, Document 178-1, 01/30/2024, 3606898, Page1 of 12
Supports: docket number and decision date
Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Park v. Kim, 91 F.4th 610 (2d Cir. 2024), No. 22-2057”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/case-033/.
Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.
Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.
