Cases and enforcement · Consolidated
Silverman et al. v. OpenAI, Inc. et al., 3:23-cv-03416 (N.D. Cal.), now part of MDL No. 3143 (S.D.N.Y.)
Verified Checked against its sources on 3 sources quoted
- Court or authority
- US – N.D. Cal. (consolidated there, then transferred to S.D.N.Y. MDL No. 3143)
- Status
- CONSOLIDATED (N.D. CAL. 2024; MDL NO. 3143, S.D.N.Y., 2025)
- Filed
- 2023-07-07 (complaint filed)
- Case type
- Copyright
- Plaintiffs or complainants
- Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, Richard Kadrey
- Defendants
- OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI, L.P., OpenAI OpCo, L.L.C., OpenAI GP, L.L.C., OpenAI Startup Fund GP I, L.L.C., OpenAI Startup Fund I, L.P., OpenAI Startup Fund Management, L.L.C.
- Legal issues
- Direct copyright infringement, unfair competition, fair use in AI training, copyrightability of AI-generated content
Summary
Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden and Richard Kadrey filed this proposed class action against OpenAI entities in the Northern District of California on July 7, 2023. They allege that OpenAI copied their books without permission to train the large language models behind ChatGPT, and they plead direct and vicarious copyright infringement, DMCA, unfair competition, negligence and unjust enrichment claims. On February 12, 2024, the court ruled on OpenAI's motions to dismiss in this case and the nearly identical Tremblay case (OpenAI did not seek dismissal of the direct infringement count) and ordered the cases consolidated with Chabon. On April 3, 2025, the case was transferred to the Southern District of New York as part of MDL No. 3143, where the authors' claims proceed in a consolidated class case. The claims remain allegations.
Key dates
- July 7, 2023Filed
- October 16, 2026Checked against sources
- October 21, 2026Checked against sources
Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: January 15, 2027.
Evidence
Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.
-
Case 3:23-cv-03416 Document 1 Filed 07/07/23 Page 1 of 17
Supports: docket number and filing date
Plaintiffs Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, and Richard Kadrey ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of
Supports: plaintiffs
-
OpenAI filed the instant motions to dismiss on August 28, 2023, seeking dismissal of
Supports: motion to dismiss covered Counts II to VI, not direct infringement
Before the Court are two nearly identical putative class complaints in Tremblay et al v.
Supports: ruling covered Silverman and Tremblay together
-
SILVERMAN, ET AL. v. OPENAI, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:23-03416
Supports: transfer to MDL No. 3143
Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Silverman et al. v. OpenAI, Inc. et al., 3:23-cv-03416 (N.D. Cal.), now part of MDL No. 3143 (S.D.N.Y.)”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/case-021/.
Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.
Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.
