Cases and enforcement · Ongoing
Doe 1 et al. v. GitHub, Inc. et al., 4:22-cv-06823-JST (N.D. Cal.); Ninth Circuit No. 24-7700
Verified Checked against its sources on 3 sources quoted
- Court or authority
- US – N.D. Cal.; Ninth Circuit (interlocutory appeal)
- Status
- ONGOING: NINTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED DISMISSAL OF DMCA SECTION 1202(b) CLAIM (16 SEPT 2026); CONTRACT CLAIMS PENDING IN DISTRICT COURT
- Filed
- 2022-11-03 (complaint filed)
- Case type
- Copyright, Unfair Competition, Privacy
- Plaintiffs or complainants
- J. Doe 1, J. Doe 2 (anonymous software developers), and a proposed class of GitHub users
- Defendants
- GitHub, Inc.; Microsoft Corporation; OpenAI entities
- Legal issues
- Copyright infringement, Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) violations, breach of contract, unfair competition, privacy violations
Summary
Anonymous programmers filed this proposed class action on November 3, 2022, against GitHub, Microsoft and OpenAI entities, alleging that GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex, trained on public GitHub code, reproduce licensed code without the attribution and license terms the licenses require. After two rounds of motions to dismiss, the case was narrowed to one DMCA section 1202(b) claim and two contract claims. Judge Jon S. Tigar dismissed the DMCA claim with prejudice and certified the question for interlocutory appeal. On September 16, 2026, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal, holding that the allegations describe tools that create new works rather than removing copyright management information from existing copies. The open-source license (contract) claims remain pending in the district court and are allegations.
Key dates
- November 3, 2022Filed
- October 16, 2026Checked against sources
- October 21, 2026Checked against sources
Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: January 15, 2027.
Evidence
Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.
-
Case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW Document 1 Filed 11/03/22 Page 1 of 56
Supports: docket number and filing date
-
the panel affirmed the district court's dismissal of part of an action brought under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") by programmers against GitHub, Inc., and other defendants.
Supports: Ninth Circuit affirmance
Filed September 16, 2026
Supports: opinion date
The court denied a motion to dismiss the contract claims, which remain pending.
Supports: contract claims pending
-
Two rounds of dismissal and amendment narrowed the case to one DMCA claim and two contract claims.
Supports: narrowing of claims
Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Doe 1 et al. v. GitHub, Inc. et al., 4:22-cv-06823-JST (N.D. Cal.); Ninth Circuit No. 24-7700”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/case-032/.
Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.
Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.
