Cases and enforcement · Dismissed
Musk v. Altman, Brockman, OpenAI, Inc., et al., No. CGC-24-612746 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco)
Verified Checked against its sources on 3 sources quoted
- Court or authority
- US – Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
- Status
- Voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by Musk on June 11, 2024
- Filed
- February 29, 2024
- Resolved
- June 11, 2024
- Case type
- Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Unfair Competition, Promissory Estoppel, Accounting
- Plaintiffs or complainants
- Elon Musk
- Defendants
- Samuel Altman, Gregory Brockman, OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI, L.P., OpenAI, L.L.C., OpenAI GP, L.L.C., OpenAI OPCO, LLC, OpenAI Global, LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive.
- Legal issues
- Breach of Contract, Promissory Estoppel, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Unfair Competition under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq., Accounting
Summary
Elon Musk sued Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and OpenAI entities in San Francisco Superior Court on February 29, 2024, alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, breach of fiduciary duty and unfair business practices on the theory that OpenAI abandoned a founding commitment to remain a nonprofit developing AI for public benefit after its partnership with Microsoft. On June 11, 2024, a day before a hearing on OpenAI's challenge to the complaint, Musk voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice. No ruling on the merits was made and no settlement was reported. Musk later pursued related claims in federal court in a separate action.
Key dates
- February 29, 2024Filed
- June 11, 2024Resolved
- October 16, 2026Checked against sources
- October 21, 2026Checked against sources
Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: October 16, 2027.
Evidence
Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.
-
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 13 CGC-24-612746 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Supports: Court and case number; file-stamped 02/29/2024
-
The case was dismissed without prejudice, according to a court filing obtained by CNBC.
Supports: Dismissal without prejudice, June 11, 2024
-
Musk’s attorneys filed the dismissal in San Francisco Superior Court without prejudice, meaning he can refile the complaint in the future. The filing didn’t provide any details about whether the parties had reached a settlement.
Supports: Dismissal; no settlement details
Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Musk v. Altman, Brockman, OpenAI, Inc., et al., No. CGC-24-612746 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco)”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/case-015/.
Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.
Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.
