Cases and enforcement · Settled
Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Fla.)
Verified Checked against its sources on 5 sources quoted
- Court or authority
- US – United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division
- Status
- Settled; court dismissed on notice of settlement January 7, 2026; plaintiffs filed a voluntary dismissal with prejudice on October 15, 2026, after the settlement was executed and approved
- Filed
- October 22, 2024
- Resolved
- October 15, 2026
- Case type
- Wrongful Death, Negligence, Product Liability
- Plaintiffs or complainants
- Megan Garcia and Sewell Setzer Jr., individually and as personal representatives of the estate of Sewell Setzer III
- Defendants
- Character Technologies, Inc., Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, Google LLC
- Settlement or damages
- Undisclosed
- Legal issues
- Wrongful death, negligence, deceptive and unfair trade practices, loss of filial consortium, unjust enrichment, AI responsibility, child safety in AI
Summary
Megan Garcia and Sewell Setzer Jr., for the estate of their 14-year-old son Sewell Setzer III, sued Character Technologies (Character.AI), its founders Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas, and Google in October 2024. They alleged that Character.AI's chatbot drew the teenager into harmful interactions before his death by suicide, and asserted negligence, wrongful death, deceptive trade practices and product liability claims. The parties reached a mediated settlement in principle in January 2026; the court dismissed the case on January 7, 2026, subject to reopening within 90 days. On October 15, 2026, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice, stating the settlement had been executed and all required court approvals received. Terms were not disclosed.
Key dates
- October 22, 2024Filed
- October 15, 2026Resolved
- October 16, 2026Checked against sources
- October 21, 2026Checked against sources
Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: October 16, 2027.
Evidence
Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.
-
Parties have agreed to a mediated settlement in principle to resolve all claims between them in the above-referenced matter
Supports: Settlement in principle, January 2026
-
A January 7 court filing in Garcia’s case shows the agreement was reached with Character.AI, Character.AI founders Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas, and Google, who were also named as defendants in the case.
Supports: Settling defendants; date of filing
-
The Court has been advised by counsel for both parties that the above-styled action has been settled.
Supports: Settlement; order dated January 7, 2026
-
This notice follows the parties' execution of their settlement agreement and receipt of all required court approvals
Supports: Final dismissal with prejudice, filed 10/15/26
-
Case 6:24-cv-01903-ACC-EJK Document 1 Filed 10/22/24
Supports: Filing date
Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Fla.)”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/case-010/.
Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.
Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.
