U.S. federal · Other
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability (U.S. Copyright Office report)
Verified Checked against its sources on 2 sources quoted
- Where
- United States
- Agency
- U.S. Copyright Office
- Instrument
- Policy report
- Status
- Published January 29, 2025; a report setting out the Office's views, not a regulation
- Issued
- January 29, 2025
- Effective
- January 29, 2025 (publication)
- Applies to
- AI developers, content creators, publishers
- Sectors
- All creative sectors
- Enforcing authority
- U.S. Copyright Office
Summary
Part 2 of the Copyright Office's report on copyright and AI, published on January 29, 2025, addresses whether outputs made with generative AI can be protected. The Office concludes that copyright protects original human expression in a work even when it also contains AI-generated material, but does not extend to purely AI-generated material or material where there is insufficient human control over the expressive elements. With current generally available technology, prompts alone do not give enough human control to make the user the author of the output, and whether human contributions suffice must be decided case by case. The report states the Office's position; it is not a regulation.
Key dates
- January 29, 2025 (publication)Takes effect
- January 29, 2025Issued
- October 16, 2026Checked against sources
- October 21, 2026Checked against sources
Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: October 16, 2027.
Evidence
Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.
-
Part 2 was published on January 29, 2025, and addresses the copyrightability of outputs created using generative AI.
Supports: Publication date and subject
-
The Office concludes that, given current generally available technology, prompts alone do not provide sufficient human control to make users of an AI system the authors of the output.
Supports: Prompts alone insufficient
Copyright does not extend to purely AI-generated material, or material where there is insufficient human control over the expressive elements.
Supports: Purely AI-generated material not protected
Whether human contributions to AI-generated outputs are sufficient to constitute authorship must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.
Supports: Case-by-case analysis
Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability (U.S. Copyright Office report)”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/fed-007/.
Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.
Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.
