Eminence Growth Solutions, home
Menu

U.S. federal · Other

Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability (U.S. Copyright Office report)

Verified Checked against its sources on 2 sources quoted

Agency
U.S. Copyright Office
Instrument
Policy report
Status
Published January 29, 2025; a report setting out the Office's views, not a regulation
Issued
January 29, 2025
Effective
January 29, 2025 (publication)
Applies to
AI developers, content creators, publishers
Sectors
All creative sectors
Enforcing authority
U.S. Copyright Office

Summary

Part 2 of the Copyright Office's report on copyright and AI, published on January 29, 2025, addresses whether outputs made with generative AI can be protected. The Office concludes that copyright protects original human expression in a work even when it also contains AI-generated material, but does not extend to purely AI-generated material or material where there is insufficient human control over the expressive elements. With current generally available technology, prompts alone do not give enough human control to make the user the author of the output, and whether human contributions suffice must be decided case by case. The report states the Office's position; it is not a regulation.

Key dates

  1. January 29, 2025 (publication)Takes effect
  2. January 29, 2025Issued
  3. October 16, 2026Checked against sources
  4. October 21, 2026Checked against sources

Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: October 16, 2027.

Evidence

Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.

  1. Part 2 was published on January 29, 2025, and addresses the copyrightability of outputs created using generative AI.

    Supports: Publication date and subject

    Copyright and Artificial Intelligence U.S. Copyright Office Primary source

  2. The Office concludes that, given current generally available technology, prompts alone do not provide sufficient human control to make users of an AI system the authors of the output.

    Supports: Prompts alone insufficient

    Copyright does not extend to purely AI-generated material, or material where there is insufficient human control over the expressive elements.

    Supports: Purely AI-generated material not protected

    Whether human contributions to AI-generated outputs are sufficient to constitute authorship must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

    Supports: Case-by-case analysis

    Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability U.S. Copyright Office Primary source

Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability (U.S. Copyright Office report)”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 16, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/fed-007/.

Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.

Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.