Outside the U.S. · Enacted
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744)
Verified Checked against its sources on 7 sources quoted
- Where
- European Union
- Jurisdiction
- European Union (EU)
- Status
- Enacted – phased application; timeline amended by the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force July 27, 2026)
- Key dates
- In force 1 Aug 2024; prohibitions and AI literacy 2 Feb 2025; GPAI and governance 2 Aug 2025; most remaining rules and Commission/national enforcement 2 Aug 2026; Annex III high-risk 2 Dec 2027; Annex I high-risk 2 Aug 2028. Omnibus: political agreement May 7, 2026, Parliament 16 Jun, Council 29 Jun, signed 8 Jul, OJ 24 Jul, in force 27 Jul 2026
- Authority
- European Commission AI Office (GPAI models; enforcement powers from August 2, 2026); national market surveillance authorities; European AI Board
- Penalties
- Up to EUR 35M or 7% of worldwide turnover (prohibited practices); EUR 15M or 3% (most other obligations); EUR 7.5M or 1% (incorrect or misleading information); lower caps for SMEs
Summary
The AI Act is the EU's risk-based AI regulation. It entered into force on August 1, 2024; prohibited practices (including the ban on inferring emotions in the workplace, except for medical or safety reasons) and AI literacy duties have applied since February 2, 2025, and the general-purpose AI model rules and governance provisions since August 2, 2025. From August 2, 2026, the AI Office and national authorities enforce the Act, and the Article 50 transparency rules apply. The Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744) amended the Act: political agreement May 7, 2026, Parliament position June 16, Council decision June 29, signed July 8, published in the Official Journal July 24 and in force July 27, 2026. It moves the high-risk obligations to December 2, 2027, for Annex III uses (which include credit scoring and, under point 4, AI used in recruitment, selection, promotion, termination, task allocation and performance monitoring) and to August 2, 2028, for AI in Annex I regulated products, adds a ban on AI systems that generate non-consensual intimate imagery or child sexual abuse material (applying from December 2, 2026), and gives existing systems until December 2, 2026, for the watermarking duty in Article 50(2). It also replaced the AI literacy article: providers and deployers must now take measures to support the development of their staff's AI literacy, without having to guarantee any specific level.
Key dates
- August 1, 2024Key date
- October 16, 2026Checked against sources
- October 19, 2026Checked against sources
- October 21, 2026Checked against sources
Developments are added when the record is reviewed. Next review: January 19, 2027.
Evidence
Each passage is quoted from its source. The quoted passages are re-checked against the live pages every month.
-
was adopted on 19 November 2025, a political agreement was reached on 7 May 2026 and entered into force on 27 July 2026
Supports: Omnibus proposal, agreement and entry-into-force dates
prohibited AI practices and AI literacy obligations entered into application from 2 February 2025
Supports: Prohibitions from February 2, 2025
the governance rules and the obligations for GPAI models became applicable on 2 August 2025
Supports: GPAI from August 2, 2025
From 2 August 2026, the AI Office and authorities of the Member States are responsible for implementing, supervising and enforcing the AI Act
Supports: Enforcement from August 2, 2026
Certain AI use-cases utilised to give access to essential private and public services (e.g. credit scoring denying citizens opportunity to obtain a loan)
Supports: Credit scoring is a high-risk use (finance relevance)
-
The broader Article 50 transparency obligations, including the requirement to disclose to users when they are interacting with AI systems, remain unaffected and proceed as scheduled from 2 August 2026.
Supports: Article 50 transparency from August 2, 2026
The new prohibition is subject to a transitional period until 2 December 2026.
Supports: New Article 5 ban applies from December 2, 2026
AI systems that have been placed on the market before 2 August 2026 will benefit from a four-month grace period (until 2 December 2026) before the watermarking obligation under Article 50(2)
Supports: Watermarking grace period
-
On 7 May 2026, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU
Supports: Provisional agreement May 7, 2026
-
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 July 2026 amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2023/1230
Supports: Instrument number and signature date
Position of the European Parliament of 16 June 2026 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 29 June 2026.
Supports: Parliament June 16; Council June 29, 2026
Done at Strasbourg, 8 July 2026.
Supports: Signed July 8, 2026
OJ L, 2026/1744, 24.7.2026
Supports: Published July 24, 2026
set to 2 December 2027 for AI systems classified as high-risk pursuant to Article 6(2) and Annex III, and to 2 August 2028 for AI systems classified as high-risk pursuant to Article 6(1) and Annex I
Supports: New high-risk application dates
Providers and deployers of AI systems shall take measures to support the development of AI literacy of their staff
Supports: AI literacy duty replaced
This obligation does not require providers or deployers to guarantee any specific level of AI literacy of any individual.
Supports: AI literacy duty softened
-
Published on: 7 May 2026
Supports: Provisional agreement announced May 7, 2026
-
administrative fines of up to EUR 35 000 000 or, if the offender is an undertaking, up to 7 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
Supports: Top penalty tier
administrative fines of up to EUR 15 000 000 or, if the offender is an undertaking, up to 3 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher
Supports: Middle penalty tier
administrative fines of up to EUR 7 500 000 or, if the offender is an undertaking, up to 1 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
Supports: Information penalty tier
-
AI systems intended to be used for the recruitment or selection of natural persons, in particular to place targeted job advertisements, to analyse and filter job applications, and to evaluate candidates;
Supports: Employment AI is high-risk (Annex III point 4(a)); read as browser page text, curl blocked by a WAF challenge
the use of AI systems to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions, except where the use of the AI system is intended to be put in place or into the market for medical or safety reasons;
Supports: Workplace emotion-recognition prohibition
Suggested citation. Eminence Scan, “EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744)”, Eminence Growth Solutions, last verified October 19, 2026, https://eminencegrowthsolutions.com/tools/eminence-scan/record/global-006/.
Using our research: you may read and quote Eminence Scan with credit to “Eminence Scan, Eminence Growth Solutions” and a link; all other rights reserved. Terms: Using our research.
Spotted an error, or a development we have missed? Report a correction. How we check records: research methodology.
